Legal Opinion

Noble's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1940No. Appeal, 137PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This appeal is from the refusal of an issue to determine whether testator lacked testamentary capacity and whether the will was obtained by undue influence exerted by Lawrence F. Probst.

This is not a common law action. In Tetlow’s Estate, 269 Pa. 486, 494, 112 A. 758, we said: “It is the established law of Pennsylvania that, in cases of the character of the one now before ns, the judge is vested with power to decide whether or not he shall submit oral evidence to the jury, even though it be conflicting. It is his right and duty, after weighing the whole evidence…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Phillips' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Tetlow's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Delaurentiis's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Fleming's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Llewellyn's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Williams v. McCarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Kerr v. O'DonovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Rosenthal's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Shuey v. ShueySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Morris WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API