Legal Opinion
Stauch v. City of Columbia Heights
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 8, 2000No. 99-2064PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
The City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota (the City) appeals the district court’s 2 denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law or in the alternative for a new trial following an adverse jury verdict. We affirm.
1. BACKGROUND
Leland and Audrey Stauch and their son, Matthew Stauch (the Stauches) owned and operated thirty-eight rental units in Columbia Heights. In 1992, twelve of these units failed to pass an inspection performed by the City. The City allowed the Stauches additional time to bring the units into compliance. Meanwhile, in November 1992, the Stauches…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- GERALD G. SALITROS, — v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, —Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Minneapolis Taxi Owners Coalition, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Carmen Austell v. Kimberly SprengerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- AMY J. MURRAY, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. CITY OF ONAWA, IOWA, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT, JAMES W. FOUTSCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Stauch v. City Of Columbia HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.