Legal Opinion

Coe v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1927No. 18113PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworti-i, J.

The defendant was convicted of burglary. The verdict was based upon the fact that certain articles taken from the burglarized building were found in the recent possession of the accused. The motion for a new trial alleges that the-two articles identified as having been taken from the burglarized building “were not found in the possession of the defendant until after three months from the time of said burglary, and that the same was not such recent possession as was required by the law.” The judge submitted this question to the jury, and they found against this contention. In Shaneyfelt v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shaneyfelt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Mathis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Wakefield Alias Wingfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. McLean v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Shivers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API