Legal Opinion

Keitaro Karamoto v. Burnett

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1933No. 7173PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, a member of the Japanese race, a native and subject of Japan, and a laborer by occupation, was lawfully admitted to the territory of Hawaii, at Honolulu, in February, 1906, by virtue of a passport issued to Mm by the Japanese government, limited to Hawaii. Thereafter, in the same year, or in the following year, he came to the continental United States, disembarking at San Francisco, Cal., and, according to bis testimony, landed without questioning or investigation by the immigration officials as to his right to come here. Since that time he has resided in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hurst v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  2. Masamichi Ikeda v. BurnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  3. United States ex rel. Fitleberg v. McCandlessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
  4. Lazzaro v. WeedinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  5. United States ex rel. La Buda v. KarnuthDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schoeps v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. Maita v. HaffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  3. Uyemura v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. Kazue Sumi v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  5. Schoeps v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API