Legal Opinion

State v. West

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 1996No. A174823; CA A89352PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). We write to address several of defendant’s assignments of error that dérive from the state’s failure to call as a witness the officer who administered defendant’s field sobriety tests (FSTs). We affirm.

On February 17, 1994, Officer Coon arrested defendant for DUII. Subsequently, Officer Slusarczyk administered FSTs to defendant,1 and Coon observed those tests. Slusarczyk did not testify at trial, and the state offered Coon’s testimony with regard to defendant’s performance on the FSTs. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. State v. McCormackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shey Elan BruceWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. Hites-ClabaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. WidermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. WestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API