Legal Opinion

Winstid v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 23, 1993No. CR-92-0551PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MONTIEL, Judge.

Larry Winstid filed a Rule 32, A.R.Cr.P., petition with the St. Clair Circuit Court, challenging his 1982 conviction for murder. The trial court denied the petition as successive without holding a hearing. The appellant makes numerous allegations in his petition. Most of the allegations fall within Rule 32.1(a), A.R.Cr.P., and, thus, are barred by the limitations of Rule 32.2(c). However, some of the allegations raised by the appellant concern the jurisdiction of the trial court and, therefore, are not time barred. State v. Hobble, 596 So.2d 613 (Ala.Crim.App.1991). In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blount v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  2. State v. HobbieCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Siebert v. HaleyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API