Legal Opinion

Tyganda Gilmore v. David Ebbert

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2018No. 17-5710PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

Tyganda Gilmore wants closure. While Gilmore was serving a sentence in federal prison, South Carolina told him that it planned to charge him with unrelated state-law offenses. He responded by asking state officials to coordinate with the Federal Bureau of Prisons to resolve the outstanding charges. But they never replied. Gilmore filed a habeas petition in federal court asking the court to dismiss the state charges because South Carolina violated the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act. The district court refused. We affirm on the ground that he named the wrong…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Robert Wayne Grant, 38013. v. Marvin Hogan, Warden, U.S. N.E.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Allen v. WashingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  2. Antonio Blanchard v. John VargaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Brooks 153447 v. HortonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2020
  4. Brooks v. HortonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  5. Cameron v. BouchardDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API