Legal Opinion

Gentile v. Westchester Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 20, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

“A court, after considering all relevant facts and circumstances presented to it, has the discretion to extend the time to serve a notice of claim” (Erichson v City of Poughkeepsie Police Dept., 66 AD3d 820, 821 [2009]; see General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Matter of Canty v City of New York, 273 AD2d 467, 467 [2000]; Matter of Battle v City of New York, 261 AD2d 614 [1999]). A factor that should be accorded great weight is whether the public corporation acquired actual notice of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days of the accrual of the claim or within a reasonable time…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Williams v. Nassau County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Felice v. Eastport/South Manor Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Gonzalez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Henriques v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Erichson v. City of Poughkeepsie Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Katsiouras v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Katsiouras v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API