Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund v. Euclid Coffee Company

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 11, 2022No. 1:14-cv-00452Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO : CLEVELAND BAKERS AND : CASE NO. 1:14-cv-00452 TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND, : : OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff, : [Resolving Doc. 11] : v. : : EUCLID COFFEE COMPANY, : : Defendant. : JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: In February 2014, Plaintiff Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund (“the Fund”) sued Defendant Coffee Company for past-due benefit premiums under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”).1 After the Court entered default judgment in favor of the Plaintiff Fund, the parties entered a settlement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frank Olle, Jr. Automatic Press Corporation and James W. Cato v. The Henry & Wright CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Ford Motor Company v. Mustangs Unlimited, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Stephanie Ann Brown v. The County of Genesee, Michigan Council 25, Afscme Afl-Cio, Local 2259Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. In re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litig.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API