Legal Opinion

In re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litig.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 14, 2021No. 20-1599PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0108p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION │ and IN RE: ANTI-VIBRATIONAL RUBBER PARTS CASES, │ End-Payor Actions. │ ___________________________________________ │ DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, > No. 20-1599 Interested Parties-Appellees, │ │ │ v. │ │ YAMASHITA RUBBER COMPANY, LTD.; YUSA │ CORPORATION; DTR INDUSTRIES, INC.; BRIDGESTONE │ CORPORATION; BRIDGESTONE APM COMPANY; TOYO │ TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, LTD.; TOYO TIRE NORTH │ AMERICA OE SALES LLC;…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Henderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Kansas v. UtiliCorp United Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Golden v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. Kloian v. Domino's Pizza, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jeremy Marchek v. USAACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  2. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Michael AngeloCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  3. ACE American Insurance Company v. Toledo Engineering Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  4. Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund v. Euclid Coffee CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
  5. Lippett v. Corizon HealthDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API