Legal Opinion

People v. Vigil

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 16, 1996No. 96SA361PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendations of a hearing board that the respondent in this lawyer discipline proceeding be disbarred. Neither the respondent nor the deputy disciplinary counsel has excepted to the panel’s action. We accept the hearing panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1976. Because he failed to answer the formal complaint filed by the deputy disciplinary counsel, a default was entered against him, and the allegations of fact contained in the complaint were deemed admitted.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. ScoreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. People v. SimsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. VigilSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CalvertSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. People v. DeRoseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. VigilSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API