LOCAL 1064, RWDSU AFL-CIO v. Ernst & Young
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentCavanagh, J.
The issue here is whether an accountant may assert the malpractice *334period of limitation as an affirmative defense to liability. The majority holds that if someone, somehow, sometime, somewhere, and in some source, labeled an action against a member of the same occupation as defendant a "malpractice” claim, then the two-year malpractice period of limitation will apply. Statutes of limitation are premised on the idea that there should be a bright-line cut-off date to potential litigation. I dissent because I believe that the majority’s holding unnecessarily confuses and obscures the rules of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sam v. BalardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Kambas v. St. Joseph's Mercy Hosp. of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Dennis v. Robbins Funeral HomeMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- City of Marysville v. Pate, Hirn & Bogue, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- LOCAL 1064, RWDSU AFL-CIO v. Ernst & YoungMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.