Legal Opinion

Quamme v. Bellino

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1995No. Civ. 950154PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

Joann Bellino appeals the modified judgment adjudicating reserved issues in her divorce from Brian Quamme. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand, holding the adjusted income of Quamme’s corporation, and not the salary paid to Quamme, should be used to calculate his child support obligation.

I

Joann Bellino (Bellino) and Brian Quamme (Quamme) were married on August 28, 1976. In September 1978, the parties moved to Wahpeton and opened their own dental office. Quamme was the dentist, and Bellino worked as the bookkeeper and dental assistant. In September 1982, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Van Oosting v. Van OostingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Becker v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Heller v. HellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Gutzeit v. GutzeitSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Olander Contracting Co. v. Gail Wachter InvestmentsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Zuger v. ZugerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Yon v. J.T.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API