Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Casualty Co. v. Washington Portland Cement Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1911No. 9249PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Leroy V. Newcomb, Esq., judge pro tempore, entered July 14, 1910, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

In June, 1905, the Pacific Construction Company, hereafter called the construction company, entered into a contract with the Washington Portland Cement Company, the appellant, whereby the former agreed to superintend certain construction work for the latter. The contract, after reciting that the appellant was about to commence the construction of a plant for the manufacture of Portland cement, provided that the construction company should furnish “all equipment, tools, and implements commonly used to construct, erect, and complete all work in connection with the clearing, grubbing, grading,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Campbell v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Jackson v. McAuleyWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Sullivan v. MattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Maxwell's Electric, Inc. v. Hegeman-Harris Co. of Canada, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. Chapman v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API