Legal Opinion

Hennessy v. Carmony

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1892PublishedCited by 16 opinions

On bill to restrain nuisance. Final hearing on the pleadings and oral proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

The object of the bill is to restrain a private nuisance.

The complainant is the owner of a small lot of land, about eighteen feet front and rear by about ninety-six feet deep, in the city of Camden, fronting on the west side of South Eighth street, about midway between Spruce street on the north and Cherry street on the south. Upon this lot is situate a small dwelling-house, composed of a main or front part of brick about fifteen feet front by thirty feet deep, two stories high, leaving a passageway of three feet on the northerly side, and having a wooden extension or kitchen,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKeon v. . SeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Hurlbut v. McKoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Russo Farms, Inc. v. Vineland Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Kosich v. Poultrymen's Service Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  3. Harvard Industries v. AETNA CAS. & SURETY COMPANYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  4. Hyde v. Somerset Air ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  5. Gilpin v. Jacob Ellis Realties, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API