Legal Opinion
Armour & Co. v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 22, 1937No. 402PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARIS, Circuit Judge.
This is an original petition for the writ of mandamus to require the Honorable Andrew Miller, as judge of the District Court of the United States for the District of North Dakota, herein called respondent, to retain and exercise jurisdiction over certain parties and subject-matter for the determination of all damages sustained by such parties and all of the parties plaintiff, in a certain action for an injunction and all further relief, now pending in the court of which respondent is the duly appointed, qualified, and acting judge; that he vacate a part of his…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Covell v. HeymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. ParisienDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Storley v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. WertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Doyne v. SaetteleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Redditt v. HaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.