Legal Opinion

Sams v. Feldman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1955No. Docket 3, Calendar 46,310PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This case arises out of an alleged breach of an agreement for the sale of real estate. The facts may be simply stated. Plaintiff Carl E. Sams offered to purchase certain property from defendant Benjamin Feldman. Feldman accepted the offer unconditionally. No reservations or contingencies pertinent to the controversy are embodied in the written offer or its acceptance. The day subsequent to the acceptance, Sams entered into an agreement to sell the same property to the St. Lawrence Development Company at an increased price. Feldman, however, refused to convey and Sams, being thus unable to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. MathisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Dikeman v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Cleveland Refining Co. v. DunningMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Miller v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Allen v. MarcianoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tuuk v. AndersenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Gaggero v. YuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Ensign Painting Co. v. Alfred A. Smith, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Ensign Painting Co. v. Alfred A. Smith, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API