Legal Opinion
Reese v. Reese
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 23, 1966No. 34941PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
192 So.2d 1 (1966)
Margaret L. REESE, Petitioner,
v.
Homer A. REESE, Respondent.
No. 34941.
Supreme Court of Florida.
November 23, 1966.
Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for petitioner.
James A. Dixon, Dixon, DeJarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell, Miami, for respondent.
DREW, Justice.
The third district court's decision in this case, that petitioner's bigamous marriage ceremony was effective to terminate her right to alimony due under a decree of divorce from her former husband, is expressly predicated on her acceptance of the right to support from the second putative husband, whose death followed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Kuehmsted v. TurnwallSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Burger v. BurgerSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Reese v. ReeseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Evans v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Frye v. FryeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Glazer v. SilvermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Dorothy I. MacPherson v. Charles R. MacPhersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Bernst v. CotterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.