Burger v. Burger
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
166 So.2d 433 (1964)
Lisolette BURGER, Petitioner,
v.
Jose BURGER, Respondent.
No. 33166.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 13, 1964.
Walters, Moore & Costanzo, Miami, and Harold Shapiro, Miami Beach, for petitioner.
Benjamin I. Shulman, Miami Beach, for respondent.
THORNAL, Justice.
By a petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, because of alleged conflicts with prior decisions of this Court. See Burger v. Burger, 156 So.2d 905.
The principal problem involves a consideration of the jurisdiction of a chancellor to dissolve a…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Prine v. PrineSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Whitney v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Fincher v. FincherSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Todd v. ToddSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Groover v. GrooverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Reese v. ReeseSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Hall v. HallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Reese v. ReeseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.