Legal Opinion
State v. Murray
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 28, 1993No. C7-92-468PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Kenneth Edward Murray for further review of the unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of modifying the Court of Appeals’ decision. One of the issues relates to the application of the patterned sex offender statute to a conviction of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree. The statute applies to offenses committed on or after August 1, 1989. The charge in question alleged that petitioner committed the offense during the year…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. ShampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lee v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Kenneth Edward Murray v. Frank W. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Kenneth E. Murray v. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- State v. GoldensteinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.