Legal Opinion

In re Vetterlein

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 5, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Petition of Matilda Hare, as Administratrix.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In September, 1871, a first dividend was declared in favor of creditors in the above matter, including the sum of $1,125, to the petitioner’s intestate, Thomas Hare, trustee. Warrants for all the dividends were executed, and most of them delivered. That to Hare, trustee, was not delivered, on account of some difficulty in the proper voucher to be given for it. Some considerable time afterwards the 'United States obtained a judgment for $99,-951 against the bankrupts upon a forfeiture of the value of goods fraudulently imported by them before the bankruptcy, and in January, 1886, commenced…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. United States v. BarnesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1887
  4. Emery v. Canal Nat. BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1872
  5. In re NimsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re VetterleinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1875
  2. First National Bank v. Cochran, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API