Legal Opinion

Emery v. Canal Nat. Bank

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine

Decided April 15, 1872No. Case No. 4,446PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFOED, Circuit Justice.

Undoubtedly the defendants as the holders of the draft and notes might have proceeded separately against the partnership, and the individual member who had become the second indorser, and they would have been entitled to judgment in each suit, though they could have but one entire satisfaction. In the case of a mere joint and several contract, the holder must at law elect a joint or several remedy, but the rule is otherwise where there are distinct contracts, though one may be incidental or collateral to the other, as for example a party may be liablé on a bill or…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winslow v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Roger Williams National Bank v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. In re VetterleinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API