Legal Opinion

AECOM Technical Services, Inc. v. Flatiron AECOM, LLC

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided March 6, 2025No. 1:19-cv-02811Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 19-cv-2811-WJM-KAS AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant, v. FLATIRON | AECOM, LLC, Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.’S MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES Before the Court is Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant AECOM Technical Services, Inc.’s (“ATS” or “AECOM”) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees Incurred from Outset of Litigation Through Conclusion of Trial (ECF No. 457) (“First Fee Motion”). In response…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. Medcom Holding Company, Cross-Appellee v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc., and Medtrain, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Regional District Council v. Mile High Rodbusters, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API