Legal Opinion

Christie v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 5, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

Six men, all employees of the defendant, were riding in the truck. Their foreman testified that it was his duty to investigate all accidents in which the members of his crew were involved and to make a report to the defendant; that he made an investigation of this particular accident immediately and found that the wheel tracks of the truck were on the right-hand side of the road. A further investigation was made a few days later by a supervising foreman, who took photographs and drew a plan of the road and surrounding territory.

In the course of his argument to the jury counsel for the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. DodgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  2. Smith v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  3. Taylor v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  4. Mason v. Dover, Somersworth & Rochester Street Ry.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
  5. Salvas v. CantinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cyr v. J.I. Case Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  2. Brown v. Cathay Island, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. Weiss v. WassermanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  4. Ware v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  5. Blais v. Flanders Hardware Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API