Legal Opinion

Salvas v. Cantin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 3, 1932PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

1. During the argument of plaintiff’s counsel to the jury, exception was taken as follows:

“Mr. Ryan: ... He (Mr. Powers) told him (the defendant) he was representing an insurance company; but after the tactics they displayed during this trial I don’t know what tactics Mr. Powers performed over there before Mr. Cantin. For all we know, — altho it isn’t in evidence,- — he might have told him that ‘If you fell asleep or if you were going fast you’re liable to criminal prosecution, and the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles in the state of Maine can write to the Commissioner of Concord and have your…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Lambert v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Malone v. ClemowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. McAndrews v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  5. Oppenheim v. BarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lea v. GentryTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Perreault v. Allen Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  3. Putnam v. BowmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  4. Higgins v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  5. Ricard v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API