State v. Tovar
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Judge.
Following a jury trial, appellant was found guilty on two counts of an indictment charging him with the sale of obscene items in violation of A.R.S. § 13-532(A)(2) and (B), (now § 13-3502). The items consisted of a film entitled “SWEDISH EROTICA # 6 WET AND WILD” (Count II), and a magazine entitled “GET DOWN WITH 3” (Count III). He was acquitted of a further Count charging him with the exhibition of an obscene film. The trial judge suspended appellant’s sentence and placed him on probation for three years on condition that he serve two months’ confinement in the county…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Eddie Odom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- People v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986