Legal Opinion
Mahaley v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 22, 1973No. Civ. A. C 71-251, C 72-67PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BATTISTI, Chief Judge:
These are consolidated suits instituted pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and § 1983 and arising under federal law invoking this court’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1343(3), 1343(4) and 1331(a). They are brought in behalf of all ten-1 ants and applicants for low-income housing, the vast majority of whom are Negro, and the Path Association, a non-, profit corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Ohio whose principal purpose is to stimulate the improvement of housing and related neighborhood conditions in the Greater…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Chester Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Artie Mahaley v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority, and Cityof EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Mahaley v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1973
- Citizens Committee for Faraday Wood v. LindsayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Berry v. School District Of Benton HarborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.