Legal Opinion
Artie Mahaley v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority, and Cityof Euclid
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 9, 1974No. 73-1407PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves a controversy over low-rent housing under the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq.
Plaintiffs are three Cleveland residents, who claim to be eligible for public housing, and an association interested in public housing, named The PATH. They filed an action in the District Court on March 15, 1971 against Cuya-hoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (CMHA), a public housing agency, its Board and Executive Director, the municipalities of Euclid, Garfield Heights, Parma, Solon and Westlake (all suburbs of Cleveland) and their…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States of America, Appellant-Appellee v. City of Black Jack, Missouri, Appellee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. City of Parma, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Sarah Sims Garrett v. City of Hamtramck, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- George Arthur v. Ewald P. NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.