Legal Opinion

State v. Kimbrell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1987No. 8622SC545PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant contends the court erred in allowing the State to cross-examine him about his knowledge and participation in “devil worshipping.” Defendant also contends that the court erred in allowing the State to cross-examine him about his son’s attempt to “sneak” or “smuggle” marijuana to him while defendant was being held in custody. For the reasons below, we hold that the court erred in both instances by permitting such questioning, but that these errors were not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial in light of the substantial evidence of defendant’s guilt.

After…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. DeLeonardoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KimbrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. KimbrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API