Legal Opinion
Heath v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 24, 2005Published
1Opinion of the Court
869 A.2d 39 (2005)
Kim HEATH, Petitioner
v.
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted on Briefs April 8, 2004.
Decided February 24, 2005.
Joseph F. Bouvier, Philadelphia, for petitioner.
Tara L. Patterson, Harrisburg, for respondent.
BEFORE: PELLEGRINI, Judge, and COHN JUBELIRER, Judge, and FLAHERTY, Senior Judge.
OPINION BY Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
Kim Heath (Claimant) petitions for review of a decision of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) which denied her benefits under the "Heart and Lung Act".[1] We affirm for the reasons…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McCarthy v. Township of McCandlessCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Rox Coal Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Bortz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Heath v. WCAB (BD. OF PROB. AND PAR.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Cunningham v. COM., PENN. ST. POLICESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.