Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Department of Veterans Affairs

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided September 14, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00354Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION FRANK H. EATON, etc., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION 20-0354-WS-M ) DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS ) AFFAIRS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Wells Fargo Bank (“Wells Fargo”) to dismiss. (Doc. 6). The parties have filed briefs in support of their respective positions, (Docs.6, 12, 16), and the motion is ripe for resolution. After careful consideration, the Court concludes the motion is due to be granted, with leave to amend. BACKGROUND According…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Klehr v. A. O. Smith Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API