Legal Opinion

Young v. Schultz

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 6, 2023No. 3:22-cv-05203Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JACALYN A YOUNG, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05203-TSH 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 20 10 RONALD J SCHULTZ, 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Pending before the Court is Defendant Ronald J. Schultz’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to 15 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 20. Plaintiffs Jacalyn Young and Diane Lynn 16 filed an Opposition (ECF No. 21) and Defendant filed a Reply (ECF No. 22). The Court finds this 17 matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API