Shacklett v. State

Appellant has appealed from a judgment on a finding of guilty of unlawfully selling, bartering, exchanging, giving away, furnishing and otherwise disposing of intoxicating liquor. Acts 1923 p. 70, §1.

The overruling of her motion for a new trial wherein she asserts that the finding of the court was contrary to law and not sustained by sufficient evidence is the only error assigned.

All of the evidence for the state was given by two police officers. One of them testified that he searched appellant’s house seven or eight times within the previous nine months for intoxicating liquor, but none was…