Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1938No. 26,878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

—The appellant, a practicing physician, was charged in two separate affidavits with selling morphine to a young woman therein named. The cases were consolidated for trial, there was a trial, and a verdict of guilty in both cases. In one case the punishment was fixed at a fine of $100, and in the other a fine of $1.00, and there was judgment accordingly.

Error is assigned upon the overruling of appellant’s motions for a new trial.

Appellant contends that the giving of the following instruction was error:

“I instruct you that the term ‘good faith’ as used in the act, means an honest intention on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Butts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  2. Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Shacklett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Niswonger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hubbard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. DownesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. WeeksSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. Pinkston v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API