Legal Opinion

Hubble v. Cole

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided July 9, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to judgment of circuit court of Smyth county, rendered March 12tli, 1890, in an action on the case wherein George 'W. Hubble was plaintiff and M. A. E. Cole was defendant. The declaration having been demurred to and the demurrer sustained, the plaintiff brought the case here on writ qf error.

1Opinion of the CourtLacy, J.

This action is covenant, and the declaration set forth that on the 30th day of December, 1881, in the county of Smyth, the defendant leased for the term of five years to the plaintiff, in consideration of the sum of $3,000, to be paid to her as stated in the deed of lease executed by them, certain real estate situated in the said county, with conditions stated and *237set forth in said deed;' that the plaintiff performed all the covenants of the said deed on his part, but that the defendant did not perform on her part, setting forth the breaches, and by injunction prevented the plaintiff from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Gorton v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Hayden v. KeithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. Cox v. Taylor's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1849
  5. Iron Mountain Bank v. Mercantile BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Knotts v. McGregorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Miller Surfacing Co. v. BridgersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Shute v. . ShuteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Virginia Beach Development Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  5. Williams v. . PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API