Legal Opinion

John Alcantara v. Leland McEwen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 8, 2015No. 12-56698Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

The Court held in Lovasco that the Sixth Amendment is irrelevant for pre-indictment delay analysis. Id. at 788, 97 S.Ct. 2044. The statute of limitations is the primary protection against stale charges, Id. at 789, 97 S.Ct. 2044, and, of course, it did not ban this murder indictment. The Due Process Clause nevertheless “has a limited role to play.” Id. Even actual prejudice does not necessarily establish a due process violation. Id. at 789-90, 97 S.Ct. 2044. Deferring indictment until the prosecutor has probable cause and until the prosecutor is satisfied that he can prove guilt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. Cecil R. Mays, Robert Jack Coltrane, Buddy Herman Mathis, Defendants- United States of America v. Robert Jack Coltrane, Cecil R. Mays, J. Robert WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API