Legal Opinion

Lee v. F. M. Henderson & Associates

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1973No. 73101C95PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

A claimant before the Industrial Commission must prove that the injury sustained was the result of an accident arising out of and in the course of employment. The phrase “arising out of the employment” refers to the origin or cause of the accident and the phrase “in the course of the employment” refers to the time, place and circumstances under which the injury occurred. Bass v. Mecklenburg County, 258 N.C. 226, 128 S.E. 2d 570. In order for an injury to arise out of the employment, it must be a natural and probable consequence or incident of the employment and a natural result…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Perry v. American Bakeries CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Jones v. Myrtle Desk CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Wamhoff v. Wagner Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  4. Bass v. Mecklenburg CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Bellamy v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parker v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. State v. McClearyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Travelers Insurance v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Goldston v. Goldston Concrete Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Jones v. Piedmont Carving Company, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API