Legal Opinion

Duhigg v. Waterloo Gasoline Engine Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 17, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Thomas, J. Guti-irie, Judge. Motion to set aside services of original notice and judgment was overruled. The defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

I. Process : service in actions growing out o£ agency. I. About March 6, 1918, plaintiff, in liis petition, claimed to have purchased of defendants a “Waterloo Boy Tractor” for $1,150; that he had paid out for freight, additional parts, and labor to put the ma- .... chine m condition, amounts aggregating ’ & t> $79.56; that the tractor was represented to plow from 8 to 10 acres a da.y, but was. unable and unfit to do so; that the seller was unable to put it in condition, and that, instead, plaintiff was able to plow only about 100 acres during the plowing season; that, if it had plowed as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wold v. J. B. Colt Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Winney v. Sandwich Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. State Ins. v. GrangerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  4. Barnabee v. HolmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Pugh v. A. D. Bothne Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Henry L. Doherty & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Huismann v. AlthoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Hartsock v. Commodity Credit Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950
  4. Syndicate Clothing Co. v. GarfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Huismann v. AlthoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API