Legal Opinion

Cahalen v. Commissioner of the Department of Employment & Training

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 6, 1996No. 94-P-1734PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlannery, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the District Court, affirming a decision of the Commissioner of the Department of Employment and Training, denying her unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to G. L. c. 151 A, § 25.

The plaintiff was employed as a customer service representative for Hi Tech Mold & Tool, Inc. (Hi Tech), a plastics manufacturer located in Pittsfield, from March 23, 1987, through January 19, 1993. She left her employment to relocate to Rhode Island with the intention of purchasing and operating a bed and breakfast enterprise. She had a written mortgage *27commitment and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garfield v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Director of the Division of Employment Security v. FingermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Abramowitz v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Director of the Division of Employment Security v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. LeBeau v. Commissioner of the Department of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tuper v. North Adams Ambulance Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Galeas v. Chelsea Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004
  3. Larson v. State Retirement Board & Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999
  4. Pena v. GeszpencMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API