Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Knapp

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1983No. Civ. 10292, 10306Published

1Opinion of the Court

332 N.W.2d 76 (1983)

Donald FISCHER and Maurice Fischer, Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v.

Richard KNAPP, Defendant and Appellant, and

Elden Brady, Defendant.

Donald FISCHER and Maurice Fischer, Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v.

Richard KNAPP, Defendant, and

Elden Brady, Defendant and Appellant.

Civ. Nos. 10292, 10306.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

April 4, 1983.

James A. Wright (argued) and Cecelia A. Wikenheiser, of Hjellum, Weiss, Nerison, Jukkala & Wright, Jamestown, for plaintiffs and appellees.

James S. Hill, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Bismarck, for Richard Knapp.

B. Timothy Durick, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Bismarck,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beck v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Dahlen v. LandisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. PhelpsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. StevensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Sagmiller v. CarlsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API