Legal Opinion
Toner v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 24, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-624 MMSPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, Jerry Toner and Charles Potter, displeased with the amount of their net compensation, brought suit against their employer, defendant Allstate Insurance Company. Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint after this Court, by Opinion and Order dated May 13, 1993, dismissed Counts I and II of their [First] Amended Complaint. Defendant has moved to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Toner and Potter have been insurance agents of the Allstate Insurance Company since 1968…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Merrill v. Crothall-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Stephenson v. Capano Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Melo v. HaferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Gaffin v. Teledyne, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tracinda Corp. v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER AGDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- In Re Daimlerchrysler Ag Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- Beale v. Edgemark Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Tracinda Corp. v. DaimlerChrysler AGDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- BAYDA v. HOWMET CASTINGS & SERVICESDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.