Legal Opinion
Tracinda Corp. v. DaimlerChrysler AG
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 20, 2003No. Nos. CIV.A.00-993 JJF, CIV.A.00-984 JJFPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before me is Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment (D.I.528) against Plaintiff, Tracinda Corporation (“Tracinda”) on the grounds that Tracinda (1) cannot establish reasonable reliance as a matter of law for its claims of common law fraud and violations of Sections 10 and 20 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), (2) cannot establish loss causation as a matter of law for its claims of common law fraud and violations of Sections 10, 14 and 20 of the Exchange Act, and (3) cannot establish any of its claims for common…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Daimlerchrysler Ag Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2003