Legal Opinion

Burns, Walker & Co. v. True

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1893No. 291PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appellee, as plaintiff, brought this suit February 25, 1890, for §1400 damages for the alleged violation of a certain contract. His amended original petition, filed September 6, 1891, alleged, in substance, that on September 6,1889, defendants and plaintiff owned the ~K. brand of horses, numbering about 150 head, defendants owning an undivided one-third and plaintiff an undivided two-tliirds interest therein.

Read the full summary

Appellee, as plaintiff, brought this suit February 25, 1890, for §1400 damages for the alleged violation of a certain contract. His amended original petition, filed September 6, 1891, alleged, in substance, that on September 6,1889, defendants and plaintiff owned the ~K. brand of horses, numbering about 150 head, defendants owning an undivided one-third and plaintiff an undivided two-tliirds interest therein. That plaintiff’s interest was worth §2800, and the defendants’ §1400. That defendants also owned another stock of horses, branded T, numbering about 25 head, worth §288. That on said…

1Opinion of the Court

HEAD, Associate Justice.

If plaintiff’s cause of action had not accrued at the time his original petition was filed, the defect was cured by filing the amendment more than a year thereafter. Culbertson v. Cabeen, 29 Texas, 254; Cox v. Reinhardt, 41 Texas, 594. No complaint is made of the failure of the court to tax the costs accrued prior to the filing of this amendment against the plaintiff. Dalton v. Rainey, 75 Texas, 516.

That part of the ninth paragraph of the charge which instructs the jury, 6‘ that choses in action are not subject to execution, and that no title thereto can pass by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Culbertson v. CabeenTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Dalton v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Jackson v. HarbyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Smith v. DeweeseTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. General Metal Fabricating Corporation, GMF Leasing Inc., and Arnold Curry v. John Stergiou and Main Marine Repair and Industrial Cleaning Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  2. Western Reciprocal Underwriters' Exchange v. CoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Lord v. F. M. Dowling Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1906
  4. Potter County v. BoesenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. American Surety Co. of New York v. Alamo Iron WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API