Legal Opinion

Potter County v. Boesen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1917No. 1094PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Potter County; William Boyce, Special Judge. Action by P. E. Boesen against Potter County. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Appellee, Boesen, filed his original petition in this case August 13, 1913. It was tried upon a second amended original petition, filed April 24, 1916. As stated in the opinion upon the former appeal, reported in 173 S. W. 462, the action was to recover compensation for the publication in the Amarillo Weekly Herald of the delinquent tax record of Potter county for the years 1885 to 1905, inclusive, amounting to the sum of $3,-425. The contract between appellant and ap-pellee contained this stipulation:

“Payment for publication to be made as delinquent taxes are paid into the hands of the tax…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wright v. . Bank of the MetropolisNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Gano v. Palo Pinto CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Culbertson v. CabeenTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Baldwin v. Travis CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Hill v. HobartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1839

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mecom v. FordTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Colligan v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Ellerd v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. City of Harrisburg v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Board of School Trustees v. Woodrow Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API