Legal Opinion

Casey v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Albany County, dismissing the complaint in an action brought to recover under a theft insurance policy containing a “mysterious disappearance” clause. The facts are fully set forth in the comprehensive opinion of Judge Sohenck in the court below. The provision of the policy reads: “ Theft. The word ‘theft’ includes larceny, burglary and robbery. Mysterious disappearance of any insured property except a precious or semi-precious stone from its setting in any watch or piece of jewelry, shall be presumed to be due to theft.” The plaintiff: claimed that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Casey v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America, New York County Courts1956
  2. Casey v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaAlbany City Court · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hammontree v. Central Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Aetna Insurance Company v. ZoblotskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Austin v. American Casualty CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Seward v. Assurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1963
  5. Omnex Group, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API