Casey v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Albany County, dismissing the complaint in an action brought to recover under a theft insurance policy containing a “mysterious disappearance” clause. The facts are fully set forth in the comprehensive opinion of Judge Sohenck in the court below. The provision of the policy reads: “ Theft. The word ‘theft’ includes larceny, burglary and robbery. Mysterious disappearance of any insured property except a precious or semi-precious stone from its setting in any watch or piece of jewelry, shall be presumed to be due to theft.” The plaintiff: claimed that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hammontree v. Central Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Aetna Insurance Company v. ZoblotskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Austin v. American Casualty CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Seward v. Assurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1963
- Omnex Group, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.