Legal Opinion

Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 1, 2020No. 1:17-cv-01110Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (Harrisburg) RHONDA J. GORTON, Personal ) Civ. Action No. 1:17-1110 Representative for the Estate of THOMAS ) D. GORTON, II, and in her own right, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Air & Liquid Systems Corporation ) As Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiff Rhonda J. Gorton (“Mrs. Gorton”), as a personal representative for the Estate of Thomas D. Gorton, II, and for herself,1 filed a first amended complaint against defendant AT&T Corp. among numerous other…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API