Legal Opinion

Powell v. Thorsen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 6, 1984No. 41297, 41298PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weltner, Justice.

This is a continuation of the litigation reported in Powell v. Thorsen, 248 Ga. 697 (285 SE2d 699) (1982).

1. We need not determine whether the first count of the complaint was a claim at law or in equity, as no material facts were in issue as to this count, and the question of James T. Lester’s right to the subject funds turned upon questions of law, including construction of a clause of Lura A. Lester’s will. Bell v. Grant, 244 Ga. 665 (261 SE2d 616) (1979). Appellants accordingly were not entitled to a trial by jury on Count One of the complaint.

2. Item 5 of the will…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mayor of Macon v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  2. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Ringer v. LockhartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Cochran v. GrooverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  5. Lowery v. IdlesonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. HawksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Bloodworth v. BloodworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Savu v. SunTrust BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Liner v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Bowen v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API