Legal Opinion
Neece v. Internal Revenue Service
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1996No. 95-5174PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Buel and Peggy Neece, husband and wife, appeal from the district court’s judgment denying as damages attorney’s fees they assert they incurred because of defendants’, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and First National Bank of Turley (bank), violation of the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 (RFPA), 12 U.S.C. §§ 3401-3422.
I
This case is before us for the third time. In 1986 a jury found Buel Neece guilty of income tax evasion for the years 1979, 1980 and 1981. Before the IRS filed any civil deficiencies, Buel Neece discussed some potential transactions…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Alvin Frazin, United States of America v. Ronald Mark MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Clifford R. Bannister v. Town of Noble, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Henry v. Merck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Peggy J. Neece Buel H. Neece v. Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America United States of America First National Bank of Turley, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eisenhour v. Weber CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Anderson v. La Junta State BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Eisenhour v. Weber CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Ferguson v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Neilson v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.