Legal Opinion

McCave v. City of Canton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1942No. 28980PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHast, J.

The questions presented by the record in this case are: (1) Where a sidewalk itself is in good repair, under what circumstances can a municipality be held liable for damages to a pedestrian caused by his falling upon ice formed on such sidewalk from water which was emitted from a drainpipe on the adjoining" private property? (2) Since liability, if any, is dependent upon notice to the defendant city, must such notice relate to the presence of the particular ice on the sidewalk upon which plaintiff slipped and fell, or may such notice arise from the existence of the drainpipe which carried the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Cohen v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Graham v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Harrington v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Tremblay v. . Harmony MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Reedy v. St. Louis Brewing Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McClellan v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Sidle v. HumphreyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Marshall v. Plainville IgaOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Zupancic v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Pearson v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API