Legal Opinion
INSLAW, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 1, 1996No. Cong. Ref. No. 95-338XPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This congressional reference is before the court on defendant’s motion in limine. Defendant seeks to exclude any claims that concern the version of PROMIS computer software (the “Lands contract”) provided by INSLAW, Inc. (“INSLAW’ or “plaintiffs”), to the Land and Natural Resources Division (“Lands Division”) (now the Environment and Natural Resources Division) of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), asserting that these claims are beyond the scope of the congressional reference.
FACTS
The essential facts of this case have been reviewed and summarized several times during the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- INSLAW, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Qiydaar v. People Encouraging People, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Tserkis v. Baltimore County, MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021